<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"><url><loc>https://www.lawfareclaims.org/briefing/judge-s-ruling-on-trump-anti-weaponization-fund-dispute-20260624-3300/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawfare Claims</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-06-24T20:02:13.194340+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Judge's Ruling on Trump Anti-Weaponization Fund Dispute</news:title><news:keywords>anti-weaponization fund, trump fund dispute, federal agency targeting, political bias, fund operations, legal standing, claimant support, conservative organizations, federal power misuse, legal clarifications</news:keywords></news:news></url><url><loc>https://www.lawfareclaims.org/briefing/doj-maintains-1-8b-anti-weaponization-fund-status-20260620-3241/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawfare Claims</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-06-23T20:02:25.980736+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>DOJ Maintains $1.8B Anti-Weaponization Fund Status</news:title><news:keywords>anti-weaponization fund, doj fund status, federal agency targeting, irs targeting, fbi targeting, political claims, legal redress, doj announcement, claimant support, fund operation</news:keywords></news:news></url></urlset>