Wantable Class Action: Rodriguez v. Wantable Status
A proposed class action alleges Wantable did not clearly disclose auto-renewal terms. No certification, settlement or claim form was found as of Nov. 9, 2026.
A proposed class action over Wantable's automatic renewals was filed in California, but no class certification, settlement or claim form was found in sources checked on November 9, 2026.
A proposed class action titled Rodriguez v. Wantable, Inc. was filed on September 2, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California under Case No. 3:25-cv-02267. Plaintiff Rebeka Rodriguez alleges that Wantable did not clearly disclose that its subscription renews automatically. The lawsuit seeks damages, restitution, and an injunction under California consumer statutes on behalf of a proposed class of California residents.
Reporting on the case comes from a summary published on October 17, 2025, by Top Class Actions and from the attorney profile of a lawyer at the law firm Buchalter. That profile describes the lawyer as defense counsel. The court docket was not reviewed for this page.
Is There a Wantable Class Action?
Yes, a proposed class action over Wantable's automatic renewals has been filed, but the sources checked on November 9, 2026 report no class certification, settlement or claim form. A docket summary on Justia lists the case as an Other Statutory Action under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). It names Wantable, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation doing business as wantable.com, as the defendant.
| Item | What the Sources Say |
|---|---|
| Case | Rodriguez v. Wantable, Inc., Case No. 3:25-cv-02267 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California |
| Filed | September 2, 2025 |
| Plaintiff | Rebeka Rodriguez |
| Defendant | Wantable, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation doing business as wantable.com |
| Proposed Class | California residents who bought an automatic renewal offer on Wantable's website |
| Claims | California Automatic Renewal Law, Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and False Advertising Law (FAL) |
| Certification, Settlement, Claim Form | Not reported and not found in sources checked on November 9, 2026 |
| Latest Reported Event | A defense firm's attorney profile lists a ruling cited as April 22, 2026 and, separately, a transfer to the District of Wisconsin with no date given; the order was not read |
| Court Docket Reviewed for This Page | No |
The status of the litigation rests on secondary coverage from Top Class Actions, a docket summary from Justia, and defense law firm Buchalter's website. The underlying court orders have not been read directly.
What the Wantable Lawsuit Alleges
The complaint alleges that Wantable fails to clearly disclose automatic renewal terms when shoppers purchase its subscription services. According to the report by Top Class Actions, plaintiff Rebeka Rodriguez signed up for Wantable's Sleep & Body Edit service for a $21.95 subscription. The complaint asserts that Wantable charged her more than $350 after she signed up.
The filing claims that Wantable placed renewal disclosures in small text that was not clearly linked to the Place Order button on its website. The plaintiff also alleges that post-purchase confirmation emails failed to provide cancellation instructions. Wantable's response to these allegations is not reported in the sources read. The federal court has not determined whether the allegations are true.
The lawsuit asserts violations of the four California consumer statutes listed in the table above. It invokes California's Automatic Renewal Law as the basis for challenging the subscription disclosures. The plaintiff asks the court to award monetary damages, order restitution, and issue an injunction.
Who Is in the Proposed Wantable Class
The proposed class definition in the complaint covers all California residents who purchased a product or service from Wantable's website that included an automatic renewal offer. If you purchased from Wantable's website with an automatic renewal offer and live in California, you fall within the proposed class definition, which is not certified. Consumers who purchased Wantable services while residing outside California are not part of the proposed class definition reported by Top Class Actions.
A proposed class is not a certified class. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(1)(A) requires a court to decide by order, at an early practicable time, whether to certify an action as a class action. The rule text is published by the Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute (LII). Under Rule 23(a), a member may sue for the whole class only if four conditions are met. The class must be so numerous that joining everyone is impracticable. The claims must raise common questions. The representative's claims must be typical of the class. The representative must fairly and adequately protect the class.
Whether a class will be certified is unknown.
Where the Case Stands
A docket summary on Justia lists motions filed by Wantable to change venue on January 12, 2026, followed by an amended motion to change venue on February 18, 2026. The docket summary classifies the case under federal CAFA jurisdiction but does not provide the text of those motions.
The Buchalter attorney profile lists, under consumer class actions, a ruling in a putative Automatic Renewal Law class action, cited as Rodriguez v. Wantable, No. 3:25-cv-02267 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2026). The profile says the ruling found that the "sign-in wrap terms were enforceable" and does not explain that phrase. It separately lists an order granting a motion to transfer venue to the District of Wisconsin, with no date given. The profile is the law firm's own summary of its work. The court's written order was not read, and its reasoning is unknown.
Searches on November 9, 2026, found no Wisconsin docket number for the case and no proceedings after the ruling cited April 22, 2026. It is unknown whether the transfer is final, what has happened in Wisconsin, whether arbitration has been compelled, or whether the case was dismissed. Because the court docket was not reviewed, later activity cannot be ruled out.
Wantable's Arbitration Clause and Class Waiver
Wantable's terms include provisions on where and how disputes are resolved. Section 24 of the current Wantable Terms and Conditions sends disputes to confidential arbitration in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Section 23 says Wisconsin law governs the terms. Section 24 also says claims must be filed within one year after they arise.
Section 24 contains this sentence, quoted exactly: "YOU AND WANTABLE AGREE THAT EACH MAY ONLY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY". The sentence says each side may bring claims against the other only in an individual capacity. Whether it bars class claims, and whether it applies to the Rodriguez case or to any individual customer, is a question for the court or a licensed attorney. Both the attorney profile's ruling note and Section 24 concern Wantable's terms.
The terms read on November 9, 2026 are the version Wantable currently publishes. That page shows a 2026 footer and no other date. The terms you accepted when subscribing may differ from the current online text. To determine whether an arbitration clause or class action waiver limits your recovery options, you can find a lawyer to review your subscription records.
What You Can Do Next
If you were charged for a Wantable renewal you did not expect, these steps do not depend on the lawsuit. They stop further billing, dispute the charge and document what happened.
- Log in to your Wantable account. Section 6 of the terms says: "To cancel your Edit Membership at any time, you must log on to your account and cancel automatic shipments".
- Contact Wantable customer care to cancel recurring deliveries and request a billing refund, using the contact information in the Wantable help center at 855-926-8225. The help center lists hours of Monday through Friday from 7am to 9pm Central Time (CT) and weekends from 9am to 6pm CT.
- Preserve all initial order confirmation emails, automatic renewal notices, credit card statements, and written communications showing cancellation requests.
- Send a billing error dispute letter to your credit card issuer. Per the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) dispute guidance, it must reach the issuer within 60 days after the first bill containing the error was sent. Send it to the card issuer's billing inquiry address, not the payments address. Include your name, address, account number and a description of the error, plus copies, not originals, of supporting documents, and keep a copy of the letter.
- Per the FTC guidance, the card issuer must acknowledge your dispute in writing within 30 days of receiving it and resolve it within 90 days. The same page says federal law limits your responsibility for unauthorized credit card charges to $50.
- File an official consumer report with the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov regarding the charges.
- Avoid any website that charges a fee to include you in a Wantable class action, because no claim process was reported or found in the sources checked on November 9, 2026.
To learn more about statutory billing protections, read the guide on consumer rights. A licensed attorney can say how Wantable's terms affect your own options.
What a Wantable Settlement Notice Would Look Like
For a class certified under Rule 23(b)(3), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(2)(B) requires the best notice practicable under the circumstances. That includes individual notice to members who can be identified through reasonable effort. The notice must say that the court will exclude any member who requests exclusion, and it must give the time and manner for requesting it.
The guide on how a class action settlement is approved and paid explains the notice, claim, opt-out and objection steps once a settlement exists. Similar subscription billing disputes include the SuperGrok cancellation class action and the Mindvalley subscription class action.
No certification order, settlement or claim form for Wantable was reported or found as of November 9, 2026, so there is nothing to join or file today. If you were charged for a Wantable renewal you did not expect, cancel through your account or customer care, keep your records and dispute the charge with your card issuer. Wantable's terms contain an arbitration clause and class waiver, so ask a licensed attorney before assuming this case would cover you. A certification order, a court-approved settlement notice or a ruling on the arbitration terms would change that advice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I join a lawsuit against Wantable?
Not based on the sources checked. Rodriguez v. Wantable is a proposed class action, and no certification order, settlement or claim form was reported or found in the sources checked on November 9, 2026.
Am I in the proposed Wantable class?
If you purchased from Wantable's website with an automatic renewal offer and live in California, you fall within the proposed class definition, which is not certified. Consumers who purchased outside California fall outside the group as Top Class Actions reports it. Whether any class will be certified is unknown.
Is there a Wantable settlement or claim form?
No settlement, preliminary approval order or claim form was reported or found in the sources checked on November 9, 2026. A court-approved settlement notice would change that answer.
What does Wantable's arbitration clause mean for the lawsuit?
Section 24 of Wantable's terms sends disputes to confidential arbitration in Milwaukee and says each side may bring claims against the other only in an individual capacity. A defense law firm's attorney profile lists a ruling, cited April 22, 2026, finding that "sign-in wrap terms were enforceable," but the court order was not read. Whether Section 24 bars class claims in Rodriguez or binds any specific customer is a question for the court or a licensed attorney.
What happened after the reported transfer to Wisconsin?
The same attorney profile lists an order granting a motion to transfer the case to the District of Wisconsin and gives no date for it. No later proceedings, docket entries or Wisconsin case number were found on November 9, 2026. The court docket was not reviewed, so the case's current status is unknown.
How do I cancel Wantable?
Log in to your account and cancel automatic shipments, as Section 6 of Wantable's terms describes. You can also call customer care at 855-926-8225. The Wantable help center lists hours of Monday through Friday from 7am to 9pm Central Time and weekends from 9am to 6pm Central Time.
How do I dispute a Wantable charge?
Send a written dispute letter to your card issuer's billing inquiry address. The Federal Trade Commission says it must reach the issuer within 60 days after the first bill with the error was sent. Keep copies of your receipts, order confirmations, and cancellation messages.
Not sure where you stand?
Check your eligibility in under 2 minutes — free, private, and no commitment required.